For Marxist free essay sample

# 8217 ; s, The Problems Facing Humanity Arise Not From Nature, But From Society. Discuss Essay, Research Paper We are invariably bombarded with ocular images of the jobs confronting humanity every twenty-four hours in the intelligence, from overpopulation and dearth to AIDS and the nursery consequence, and more frequently than non these are presented to us as # 8216 ; natural # 8217 ; happenings. In fact, concern for the environment has reached such a febrility pitch that a Green political party has emerged to garner these # 8216 ; cognizant # 8217 ; ballots. But how # 8216 ; cognizant # 8217 ; are they? Marxists would hold us believe that the jobs confronting humanity derive entirely from society and that any denial of this is a consequence of our conditioning within the capitalist system. In this essay I aim to analyze this Marxist reading of the state of affairs world finds himself in via the usage of several instance surveies and a comparing with the Green motion. The outgrowth of a # 8216 ; Green # 8217 ; political party that promises to concentrate most of its attending on envir onmental issues is symbolic of a recent displacement in society # 8217 ; s attitude that can be partially attributed to the attempts of administrations such as Friends of the Earth. For many old ages these administrations have run runs with rubrics like # 8220 ; Help the Earth fight back # 8221 ; , that are aimed at increasing society # 8217 ; s consciousness of environmental issues ; foregrounding the ecological jobs acid rain, the nursery consequence and atomic power etcetera, will do in the hereafter. They claim that # 8220 ; [ mankind ] knows plenty to change by reversal [ some of ] the [ environmental ] harm, and to pull off the Earth # 8217 ; s amazing wealth more reasonably and sustainably. But the political will to convey about such a transmutation is still missing # 8221 ; ( Friends of the Earth, day of the month unknown ) . The Green # 8217 ; s have attempted to offer society this will. Formed about twenty old ages ago the bulk of Greenss are deterministically ecocentric, believing that adult male is portion of the planetary ecosystem and topic to # 8216 ; natural # 8217 ; bounds ( on population and economic growing ) . Their ecological stanc e emerged as a consequence of dissatisfaction with the bing anthropocentric universe position that # 8220 ; license [ s ] the human species to work the remainder of nature as if from above and outside it # 8221 ; ( Capra and Spretnak, 1984, ppxxiv ) . Rather than this exploitatory relationship the ecocentric position prefers to emphasize mankind # 8217 ; s need to re-relate with nature via the acceptance of an anti-industrial ( and hence anti-capitalist ) political orientation and a return to a more fundamental way-of-life. This formal political # 8216 ; policy # 8217 ; is the manifestation of the Green # 8217 ; s primary concern, that # 8220 ; modern engineering is out of control, endangering the balance between human society and the natural universe # 8221 ; ( Richards, 1989 ) . This radical position does nevertheless, have its defects. The first job is that the Green # 8217 ; s Utopian vision of a return to a pre-industrial society would ensue in them being unable to est ablish an effectual planetary response to some of the planetary menaces that face humanity, since the technological expertness which would hold necessarily developed and solved the jobs would non be pursued. As Frank Richards ( 1989 ) says in an article for Populating Marxism, # 8220 ; the experience of history is that every progress creates new jobs but that it besides creates the agencies of work outing them # 8221 ; , a fact the Green # 8217 ; s do non look to set much accent on. From a similar Marxist point of view, the Green # 8217 ; s want of an economic status-quo would ensue in the relationship between the labor and middle class besides staying inactive, forestalling the release of the # 8216 ; prole # 8217 ; via the contradictions inherent in capitalist society, and the decease of any # 8216 ; possible # 8217 ; for a socialist province. Although this may well forestall farther industrial end product and pollution in the short-run, Marxists would reason that the actu ating power of capital ( linked to our conditioning in a capitalistic manner of production ) would ensue in a return to the bing form of production, and therefore pollution, in the long-run. Equally far as the Marxist would be concerned this effort to work out the environmental jobs via the use of the superstructure, instead than the political reform ( non regress as the Green # 8217 ; s would hold us believe ) of the base, is a halfhearted effort, doomed to failure. So, if a Marxist review of the Green # 8217 ; s can cut down their political credibleness, what do they themselves have to offer in footings of an analysis of the current menaces to humanity? Marxist # 8217 ; s believe that before you can understand any alteration ( political, economic, environmental etc. ) , you foremost necessitate to understand the procedures that keep society reproducing ; these procedures are the material procedures of production and distribution of nutrient, goods and services ( Matley, 1966 ) . They see this productive activity as a manner of obtaining a agency of subsistence through interacting with nature via the drudging activities of work forces, and that through this labour both adult male and nature alteration ; # 8220 ; in the procedure of battle against nature, adult male non merely changes the character of nature, but besides himself, by geting new qualities, wonts and experience # 8221 ; ( Matley, 1966 ) . The theoretical logical thinking behind this premise, that adult male and nature alteration in unison, is that the transmutation of nature allows # 8220 ; an expanded reproduction of productive forces # 8221 ; ( Corbridge, 1986 ) over clip, which enables society to be at a higher degree, in both demographic and mercenary footings. With society and nature developing as a consequence of adult male # 8217 ; s labour, it follows that adult male must besides develop ; enabling him to make continually higher rational planes which demand the satisfaction of ass ociated new demands and wants. Once these new demands and wants have been satisfied, as they inevitably will be, adult male will make an even higher plane of being through the farther development of nature, that will make a new set of demands and wants, and so the futile effort to fulfill humanity # 8217 ; s insatiate lecherousness for # 8216 ; more # 8217 ; continues ( this procedure is known as a dialectic and was seen by Marx as the logical development of society ; halting merely when everyone was fulfilled in what would so hold become a socialist province ) . For Marxist # 8217 ; s, this thrust to continually accomplish # 8216 ; more # 8217 ; is an built-in portion of the capitalist system, whereby # 8216 ; more # 8217 ; translates as the potency for the middle class to increase the sum of capital they have accumulated, either via consumers increased ingestion or by manufacturers progressively efficient production. For the middle class to maximize excess value ( net inco me ) , they have to guarantee that the exchange value is greater than the sum of labor invested in the merchandise. However, to sell the merchandise ( which is a requirement to doing net income ) , it is necessary for the labour force to hold plenty buying power to represent a important market. It hence follows that to supply adequate work to hold a work force that can purchase the merchandise and to make a continually widening profit-margin ( excess value ) , production must invariably spread out ( Smith, 1984 ) . This # 8216 ; enlargement at all costs syndrome # 8217 ; is related to the current manner of production and can be viewed as one of the primary accounts for # 8216 ; industrial # 8217 ; pollution of the environment, since # 8220 ; the thrust for short-run net income forces capitalists to ignore the possible long-run dangers of industrial procedures # 8230 ; .. [ and ] policies to protect and conserve natural resources are antithetical to profit-making # 8221 ; ( Ri chards, 1989 ) . This position that it is capitalist economy and capitalists who are to fault for the current jobs confronting humanity contrasts starkly with the Green # 8217 ; s who believe that it is # 8220 ; modern engineering [ which ] is out of control # 8221 ; ( Richards, 1989 ) ; a singular accomplishment for inert machinery. One of the best, although non the most widely appreciated, illustrations of this myopic involvement in short-run capital accretion taking to environmental jobs, is in the agriculture industry # 8211 ; a sector that is usually perceived as # 8216 ; caring # 8217 ; about nature. In recent old ages developments in Western agricultural patterns have resulted in there being huge additions in the outputs of most harvests, so much so that immense mountains of nutrient are now being stored in warehouses to maintain monetary values unnaturally high. However, although these new patterns have increased the husbandmans ( the middle class ) short-run net incom es, concerns are now mounting that their long-run hereafter as nutrient manufacturers may be in uncertainty as a consequence of their short-run activities holding a damaging consequence on dirt birthrate ( Curtis, Courtney and Trudgill, 1976 ) ; # 8220 ; in its uncontrolled thrust for catholicity, capitalist economy [ has ] create [ vitamin D ] new barriers to its ain hereafter # 8221 ; ( Smith, 1984 ) . The patterns doing the most concern are the high inputs of unreal fertilizers, chemical pesticides, weedkillers and the usage of machinery ( as opposed to machinery itself ) ; all elements introduced to increase the short-run efficiency of the dirt. These patterns have resulted in the eutrophication of rivers and H2O, land pollution with antibiotics used in carnal raising, impairment in dirt drainage and construction through over plowing, dirt eroding following hedgerow remotion for larger more # 8216 ; efficient # 8217 ; Fieldss and a long-run pH lessening through increasing us age of inorganic fertilizers ( Curtis, Courtney and Trudgill, 1976 ) . Although some of these patterns have been scientifically proven harmful to the environment ( such as inorganic fertilizers ) , all of them will go on to be utilised by the husbandman ( the middle class ) since they guarantee their economic endurance. This type of scheme, prosecuting anything that increases the profit-margin, is adopted through all types of industry, including those that have the possible to change the environment on a planetary graduated table. Marxist’s position this as the middle class trying to project the costs of production to society, so that they, as the proprietor of the production installation, incur less of them. They believe that capitalists are improbable to recycle residues or take pollutants from industrial production at their ain cost ( cut downing their net income ) when these costs can be diffused throughout society as metals in the air, acerb rain or chemicals in the sea. Neither would the current Green position that ‘the defiler pays’ work, since the middle class would necessarily project the costs by go throughing them on to the consumer instead than diminishing their net incomes. So, in the instance of pollutant orientated jobs, the Marxist position offers an priceless penetration into the analysis of why the job is every bit big as it is but, unlike the Green’s, appears to do few suggestions as to how they can be solved. Predictably, the response they do do is that under a socialist manner of production there would neer be an environmental crisis, since the factor doing the job, capitalist economy, would no longer be. Alternatively of working for private addition, people would â€Å"lose [ their ] preoccupation with private interests† preferring alternatively to â€Å"find their ain felicity in working for the good of all† ( Singer, 1980 ) , the consequence being that excesses in the signifier of pollution would be a thing of the yesteryear. However, Marxist’s believe the lone manner they will of all time accomplish this end ( of a socialist manner of production ) is if the full development of productive forces returns unabated. They see the division of society into categories as the consequence of deficient production, so growing towards a sufficiency is needed before people will get down to believe about the construction of the society in which they live ; in this sense they see engineering as an emancipatory force for the labor ( Smith, 1984 ) . But what is sufficient? And will this province of sufficiency of all time be reached by everyone, every bit long as capitalists continue to work the working-class? In my sentiment ’sufficient’ for the multitudes is apt to be a considerable map of ‘that which the capitalists have got’ . However, they are neer likely to accomplish this since any betterment in the criterion of life for the labor is merely traveling to be as a consequence of a treble addition for the middle class, an equation that culminates in the sufficiency-threshold increasing. So, if the Marxist’s are expecting the reaching of sufficiency for the labor before any social revolution Begins, they are, in my sentiment, likely to be waiting a long-time ; so long in fact, that at the present rate of environmental impairment, they may non desire to ‘inherit’ the decrepid remains of a society t hey have been patiently ‘waiting’ ( instead than politically ‘fighting’ ) for. So far, I have merely included in my survey of the jobs confronting humanity, those wide environmental jobs that can be attributed to capitalist society’s thrust to roll up capital in the short-run ; no treatment holding taken topographic point on other pressing issues such as overpopulation. But before I can discourse this, I must foremost clear up what is meant by the term ‘overpopulation’ . In an article in The Independent ( 23/4/92 ) Prince Charles was quoted as stating â€Å"the issues of population growing and poorness [ need to be addressed ] in the same breath† , a logical nexus. However, we may besides state that overpopulation is evidenced by the being of people who do non hold plenty to eat, since this is an component of poorness, and it is this that I am traveling to concentrate on. When we see newsreel on dearths such as those in Ethiopia a nd Sudan we usually see Michael Berk presenting them as ‘natural disasters’ , but this does non needfully follow. Rather than the dearth being the consequence of overpopulation or the absolute inability of the Earth to bring forth any more nutrient, it could good be the consequence of some of the population being unable to purchase ( or trade ) the nutrient, merely as a consequence of economic sciences ( although true this is non ever true ) . For Marxist’s this is more likely to be the instance, establishing their analysis of nutrient deficits on Marx’s theoretical ‘reserve army’ . Marx showed that it was cardinal to the operation of a capitalist system that wages must be kept every bit low as possible ( to increase excess value ) and that to make this there must be a pool of unemployed labor ( the modesty ground forces ) . This ‘pool’ acts as a sedative to pay degrees since there are a uninterrupted watercourse of unemployed peo ple waiting to take any places if the residents decide to strike for more rewards ; the competition for occupations maintaining the rewards low. The consequence of this ‘pool’ is that the unemployed and the marginally employed battle to purchase plenty nutrient to last. This Marxist reading of a monolithic population enduring from nutrient deficits offers an interesting option to Malthus. Malthus believed that deficits were the ‘natural’ consequence of nutrient production increasing at an arithmetic ratio and population increasing at a geometric ratio, the difference being met by the starvation hosts. He believed that the lone manner this deficit could be prevented was for the working classes to keep their ain passions and that the â€Å"threat of poorness and the trouble of feeding kids [ was ] needed [ as disheartenment ] † ( Richards, 1989 ) . Marxist’s believe that this ill-founded fact was used by capitalists to warrant the low rewards an d widespread poorness that the labouring categories experienced in the 19th century. Although, this position may be somewhat out of day of the month, the Marxist position maintains its relevancy. In 1943 Bengal suffered an flagitious dearth in which one one-fourth of its population died. This dearth had nil to make with nutrient deficits, it was wholly related to economic sciences. The one-fourth of the population that died were the rural laborers, who from a Marxist position would hold constituted the marginally unemployed and reserve ground forces. The job arose out of a monolithic enlargement of economic activity, related to the war attempt at the clip, which favoured the capitalists in the urban Centres at the disbursal of the rural labouring categories. These rural categories, as a consequence of the capitalists attempts to maximize net incomes, lost out in the conflict to command nutrient ( and were forgotten in the euphory of the ( urban ) minute ) since their exchange entitl ements ( Sen, 1981 ) were significantly reduced because their rewards had non increased at the same rate as the nutrient monetary values. It was the badness of this lessening in their existent income and the care of such a big modesty ground forces by the urban capitalists, instead than any natural catastrophe, that caused the awful figure of deceases experienced in Bengal. However, although it is apparent from the instance surveies reviewed so far that the Marxist position on Green issues, such as environmental pollution and overpopulation, places the incrimination on the current manner of ( capitalist ) production, as opposed to ‘nature’ itself, how do they see jobs related to medicate etcetera, that are non portion of the Green docket? There can be no uncertainty that illnesses such as malignant neoplastic disease and AIDS are menaces to humanity, but how can the Marxist’s explain these in footings of the capitalistic universe market? Apart from tenuous links to atomic power and radiation, malignant neoplastic disease does non look easy explained, neither for that affair does AIDS, other than with combative mentions to its seemingly ‘unnatural’ ( homosexual ) origins. But if these menaces can non be satisfactorily explained by the thrust to roll up capital ( that is an built-in portion of capitalist economy ) , it must be assumed that similar jobs would originate under a socialist manner of production, a fact that slightly tarnishes the Marxist ideal of a Utopian society and dramatis personaes intuition over some of their old claims. To reason so, it is apparent from this survey that a Marxist analysis of Green issues is a utile manner of sing the current environmental and demographic jobs that face humanity. Whereas the Green’s considerations revolve around a deterministic epistemology, Marxist’s, in offering a review of the capitalist manner of production, have presented us with an interesting option to the à ¢â‚¬Ëœnaturalistic’ position of the jobs confronting society, and one that offers hope for a solution. However, although a Marxist analysis of jobs such as those medically related is unsatisfactory, proposing that their claims for perfect felicity under a socialist manner of production are ill-founded, what is most worrying about this position is that although they recognise the dangers presented to mankind, they are in no haste to get down the procedure of work outing them. Rather than â€Å"Helping the Earth fight back† they seem prepared to wait for the oncoming of socialism, certain in themselves that this is the lone manner to work out the job. Lashkar-e-taibas hope we do non hold to wait that long.Bibliography Capra, F and Spretnak, C ( 1984 ) Green Politics, Hutchinson and Co. Ltd Corbridge, S ( 1986 ) Capitalist World Development, Macmillan Curtis, L, Courtney, F and Trudgill, S ( 1976 ) Soils in the British Isles, London, Longmans Friends of the Earth ( day of the month terra incognita ) Help the Earth Fight Back Matley, IM ( 1966 ) The Marxist Approach to the Geographical Environment, AAAG, 56, 97-111 Richards, F ( 1989 ) Can capitalism travel Green? , in Living Marxism, no.4 Sen, A ( 1981 ) Poverty and Famines, Oxford University Press Singer, P ( 1980 ) Marx, Oxford, Oxford University Press Smith, N ( 1984 ) Uneven Development, Oxford, Blackwell Sunday Times, 25/6/89, ppA7a The Independent, 23/4/92, pp22 Times 26/6/89, pp14b Times, 24/9/90, pp12c 3bc